2015: We need a Level Playing Field, the Gov should not
Threaten or intimidate Aspirants– Umana Umana
“If the governor juggles in the political turf as an
aspirant, fellow aspirants might be tempted to throw mud at him and it is
not good for mud to be thrown at the governor as his office is an exalted
office. The governor should not campaign in the churches for one person…”
Umana Okon Umana, former SSG, AK |
One of the strong contenders of the 2015 governorship
race in Akwa Ibom State and a former secretary to the Government of Akwa Ibom
State, Mr Umana Okon Umana has urged the state governor to desist from
intimidating, threatening other aspirants and campaigning in churches for his
current SSG as it was not fair for the governor who should play the role of a
father in the 2015 race to do so.
Obong Umana also appealed to the
governor to stop parading himself in the garb of an aspirants and to avoid
mudslinging as his presence in the political turf of 2015 could mislead
aspirants to consider him as an aspirant and as such could be tempted to throw
mud at him, in the believe that they are doing so to one of them(aspirants),
oblivious of the fact such is done to the governor, urging that the office of
the governor was so venerable to be dragged into mud.
Mr Umana said during the time of
governor Attah, Chief Godswill Akpabio sought to be governor and as a
commissioner (then), governor Attah never censored him or threatened other
commissioners not to relate with and support him, even though the governor was
not supporting his aspiration. He recalled that governor Attah
never campaigned in churches and other public places for his preferred aspirant
and never reprimanded persons in his cabinet who supported Chief Akpabio,
adding that Chief Akpabio’s style was not encouraging.
In a media interaction in his
private residence in Ewet Housing last week, Obong Umana described the idea of
a promise by governor Akpabio to hand over the mantle of leadership of the
state to him in 2015 as a purely “academic exercise”, saying that whatever
promises were made in the past did not matter to him as he was already in the
race of 2015 governorship. “Whether the governor offered to support me in the
past or not does not matter, what matters is that I am in the race because I
believe I have something to offer to better the lots of the people”, he said.
On whether he resigned his
appointment or was pushed out of office, he stated that any position one
accepts to serve is at the pleasure of the governor. He stated that
as a position of service taken on appointment, the occupant of the office has
the right to resign when he feels he should do so and the governor can also ask
you to disengage when he feels that you should no longer continue with him. “ I
believe that based on my letter of disengagement, if we have to go by that, the
governor thanked me for my contributions to the development of the state and
wished me well”, he said.
He stated further that “may be the
manner of disengagement was not tidy” as he was outside the state when the
event took place. Umana told Journalists that may be there were Policemen
and officers of the DSS, but that he heard and saw it all on AIT, Channels and
NTA, adding that what happened could not have been speculations.
Mr Umana stated that since he was
not around he could not have known who led the operation of sealing his office
but that he was told it was the governor’s wife that led the operation,
expressing surprise for such drama about what he considered a routine exercise,
saying it was “unnecessary and an exercise taken too far”.
On why he wanted to be governor he
said he would have time to clearly address the salient issues, but assured that
having been with the administration as the Finance Commissioner and later
Secretary to the State Government, he was aware of the “soft issues of development like health, education and
security in addition to the expansion of core infrastructure - road
network, sea port, power, science and technology. Outside a robust
industrialization programme we have to pay a special attention to the
development of agriculture because this will create jobs and raise the
standard of living of our people”.
When asked whether the letter to
the National Human Rights Commission against the governor emanated from
him he did not deny it, but said it was not about him alone but about all the
persons whose lives were at risk and recounted a threat letter sent to him and
the withdrawal of his police security on the orders of the governor as pointing
to issues that needed to be investigated, and said that did not amount to
asking for too much.
“In December, I received a threat
letter, a copy of which I had submitted to the police. I was asked to withdraw
from the governorship race, or they will get me in Akwa Ibom, Lagos or Abuja. I
did not pay too much attention to it because I had Police protection. I was in
Abuja when I got the reports that my security details had been withdrawn. It
came as a surprise; a curious coincidence, that just a few days after I
received that threat my security details were withdrawn and I was told that the
order came from the governor. That gives us cause for concern”, Mr Umana
stated.
Speaking on his relationship with
the present SSG, Mr Umana said his relationship with Mr Udom Emmanuel “is very
cordial” describing him as a “fine gentleman” whose swearing-in ceremony
he attended and wished him well. He said the office was for one to make
his contributions and moved on just as the office of the governor, it has
expiry date.
He neither denied nor owned up
being involved in assassination plots while in government but said it was not
part of his “mandate” as the SSG, stating that the buck stops at the table of
the governor as the chief security officer who holds the red pen and approves
everything, hence he takes credit and blame for whatever was done rightly or
wrongly by his administration. Hear him, “If
you go and look at the ministerial responsibilities of the office of the SSG, I
don’t think you will find any item on how to advice on killings, assassination
or murder. It wasn’t part of my mandate so I only operated and acted within the
mandate of my office. Let me also point out that it is the governor who is the
Chief Security Officer. All the security Chiefs report to the governor and it
is the governor who is vested with the powers to run the state
constitutionally, so the buck stops on his table. He must accept responsibility
for the successes and failures of his administration”.
He said the governor as a leader
is bound to take responsibility for all actions of his government, as he alone
has the power to hire and fire at will, describing as ridiculous the rumour at
that time that he was the one recommending people to be removed from office and
brought onboard the state executive council, and wondered if he could have put
a short gun on the governor’s head to hire and fire.
Asked to comment on his plan B if
the PDP denies him ticket at the primaries he said he has no plan B as he was
sure that the massive support he was enjoying from the state will earn him the
ticket at the primaries, just as he debunked the claims that he and others were
in strong alliance against government interest. He wondered why
government should have special interest in who aspires to the office of the
governor. He recalled that governor Akpabio contested against 57 other
persons in 2007and was not barred by governor Attah from interacting with
others, nor was the State Chairman of PDP then(Arc. Otu Ita Toyo)
intimidated not to pick calls of other aspirants. He appealed to the
governor to stay neutral on the matter of who emerges his successor in
2015 and allow a level playing field for all aspirants to campaign for
support across the state.
Speaking about his opinion on
zoning Mr Umana said “the governor himself in the past had dismissed zoning. He did that
on National Television when the Minister of Information held the Town hall
meeting in Uyo during the Good Governance tour. When the question was put to
him about zoning, Governor Akpabio said he was not a product of zoning; that in
2006 there were 58 contestants from all the senatorial districts. Then, the
party did not bar anybody so there were aspirants from all the three senatorial
districts. That was in 2006. Again in 2011, we had Frank Okon from Eket
Senatorial District; we had Imo Udoh from Uyo Senatorial District… it shows the
level of insincerity and absurdity and the fact that until I left office, the
issue of zoning did not arise. Again you ask, what a curious coincidence that
the whole zoning idea came up only after I left office. Why? It is for you to
find out”.
Mr Umana decribed the town hall
meetings as “predetermined” since the intention of the whole exercise was
replaced with the presentation of government candidate for 2015 and
adumberation of the story of zoning.
“The meetings were stage-managed
to ensure that the position of governor was zoned to one particular person and
yet we went through the pains and the expenditure of the town hall meetings,
whereas the outcome was already pre-determined…There was nowhere in the
advertorial published by the ministry of information preceding the town hall
meeting where it was stated that there was going to be a referendum on zoning
or on the selection of a governor for the state before the primaries and
general elections”, he said.
Mr Umana believed that what the
town hall meeting would have done for the people was abdicated. He querried
why the revenues of government were not made public as it was the place of the
citizens to be told what the state realized and how it was spent for any
period. He said during the time of Governor Attah such information was
made public on quarterly basis for the consumption of the public.
“Even when some people alleged
that Akwa Ibom has received over two trillion Naira and that the
performance of government was not commensurate with the level of resources, the
Ministry of Finance or the Ministry of Information has still not provided a
detailed revenue and expenditure report whereas transparency is a core
requirement of good governance. We expected them the following day to publish
everything to say this is what we have received so far; from statutory allocation,
derivation, special releases from the excess crude accounts, from the Paris
Club reconciliations, from all the recoveries from under-payments,
reimbursements and recoveries after the return of oil wells, then they would
tell us in total, this was what we received. This is not asking too much
of any government, because transparency is part of good governance. But until
the town hall meetings ended, there was no such report…For performance to be
properly assessed; it must be benchmarked against the quantum of resources. The
Hon Minister of Finance made the same point recently. I was the commissioner
for Finance during the administration of Obong Victor Attah and we had
quarterly publications on the revenue and expenditure profile of the state. And
it was for public consumption; you could walk into the ministry and pick it
up. Until the town hall meetings ended they were not able to provide the
information. Even as we speak, they have not provided the information. There
was also a question on the debt profile of the state but have we had any
answer?”, the former SSG querried.
He thanked the media in the state
for living up to its billing and promised to make public his blue print for the
people of Akwa Ibom state at the appropriate time.
No comments:
Post a Comment